Ahl Al-Hadith and Ahl Ar-Ra’yi in the Formation and Development of Islamic Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59683/ijls.v3i2.88Keywords:
Ahl Al-Hadith, Ahl Ar-Ra’yi, Islamic LawAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role and contribution of Ahl Al-Hadith and Ahl Ar-Ra’yi in forming and developing Islamic law. These two groups of thought emerged in the 2nd century Hijriah with different approaches to interpreting the sources of Islamic law. This study uses a qualitative research type with a descriptive-analytical approach. The primary data in this study are classical and modern literature relevant to the thoughts of Ahl Al-Hadith and Ahl Ar-Ra’yi. Data sources include classical Islamic law books, books, and scientific articles that discuss the methodology of these two groups. Data collection techniques are carried out through library research by analyzing primary and secondary texts. The collected data are analyzed using content analysis techniques, which aim to explore the methodological patterns of the two groups in interpreting Islamic law. The study results show that despite having different methodological approaches, both seek to uphold Islamic law by maqashid al-sharia. Ahl Al-Hadith contributed to the birth of the Maliki and Hanbali schools, emphasizing the text's authority. At the same time, Ahl Ar-Ra’yi played a role in introducing the flexible ijtihad method popularized by Abu Hanifah. This approach was later balanced by Imam Syafi'i, who integrated text and reason into his ushul fiqh. This study concludes that the differences in methodology between Ahl Al-Hadith and Ahl Ar-Ra’yi not only enrich the treasury of Islamic law but also provide a mechanism for adapting Islamic law to changing times while maintaining the basic principles of sharia.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, M. (2019). The Defense Of Hadith Scholars Against Ahl Al-Ra’y Madhhab (Study of Thought Shaikh ‘Abd al-Fattâh Abû Ghuddah). Jurnal Ushuluddin, 27(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v27i1.4594
Ansori, A., & Munawir, M. (2022). Ahl al-Hadis and Ahl al-Ra’y (A Polemic of Domination Dynamics on Hadith). AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i3.4369
Anwar, S., Bawazir, F., Sakina, R., Lukita, M., Hernata, N., Miranda, M., & Ridwan, M. (2023). Mazhab Syafi’i Sebagai Paradigma Dalam Pemikiran Dan Penetapan Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Varia Hukum, 5(2), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.15575/vh.v5i2.28191
Azmi, A. S. (2017). Ahl al-Hadith Methodologies on Qur’anic Discourses in the Ninth Century: A Comparative Analysis of Ibn Hanbal and al-Bukhari. The Online Journal of Research in Islamic Studies, 4(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.15364/ris17-0401-02
Biodun, Q. B. S., & Jangebe, H. A. (2024). Irregular Hadith According to Imam Shafi’i: An Applied Study. Global Journal of Research in Humanities & Cultural Studies, 4(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11114178
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Djawas, M., Achyar, G., Arifin, N., Reza, M., & Yakub, B. (2022). The Legal Position of Children of Incest (A Study of Madhhab Scholars and Compilation of Islamic Law). Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 6(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i1.11904
Elviandri, E., Saiin, A., & Farkhani, F. (2019). Pembacaan kaum feminis terhadap hadis-hadis misoginis dalam Sahih Bukhari. Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 19(2), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v19i2.243-257
Faizin, A. (2023). Neo-Ahl Al-Hadîts In Contemporary Islamic Legal Thought: The Influence of Nâshir al-Dîn al-Albânî in the Salafist Movement in Indonesia. Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 27(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v27i1.3381
Fanani, M. (2010). Konstruksi Hukum Islam di Dunia Modern. Yogyakarta: PT Lkis Printing Cemerlang.
Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (6 (ed.)). London: SAGE Publications.
Haris, M., Jalaluddin, & Mahmud, H. (2023). Istinbath Hukum Islam Perspektif Ahlul Hadis Dan Ahlul Ra’yi. JIS: Journal Islamic Studies, 1(3), 249–261. https://qjurnal.my.id/index.php/jis/article/view/433
Hasyim, M. F., AW, L. C., Jaelani, I. A., Basuki, Wijaya, A., & Ahid, N. (2020). The Process of Al-Bukhari Fiqh Methodology Development in Islamic Law. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(1), 653–667. https://www.ijicc.net/images/Vol_14/Iss_1/14163_Hasyim_2020_E_R.pdf
Ikhsan, M., & Iskandar, A. (2022). Inter-Religious Interaction From The Perspective of Hadith As A Source of Islamic Law. Al-Bukhari Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 5(1), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v5i1.2593
Ikhwan, A. (2021). Metode Penelitian Dasar (Mengenal Model Penelitian dan Sistematikanya). Tulungagung: STAI Muhammadiyah Tulungagung.
Jannati, M. I. (2022). Factors Responsible for Emergence of the Practice of Ra’y. Al-Islam.Org. https://al-islam.org/al-tawhid/general-al-tawhid/ijtihad-its-meaning-sources-beginnings-practice-ray-jannati/factors
Köklü, R. (2023). Hâkim en-Nîsâbûrî ve Ma’rifetü ulûmi’l-hadîs’in Hadis Usulü Tarihindeki Yeri (Hakim al-Nisaburi and the Place of Ma’rifat al-ulūmi al-hadīth in the History of Hadith Methodology). Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 54(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.17120/omuifd.1267928
Majid, A., Sagirah, S., Wendry, N., Safri, E., & Syafruddin, S. (2023). The Method in Understanding Hadith Through Ijmā’ and Its Implications for Islamic Law in Indonesia: Studies on the Hadiths of the Month of Qamariyah. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 7(1), 281. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.12383
Muhit, M., Herawan, J., & Yunus, M. (2023). Basic Construction of Sharia Economic Law Based on Ushul Fiqh Asy-Syafi’i (Critical Analysis of the Book of Ar-Risalah). Journal of Social Research, 2(3), 632–639. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i3.706
Munawir, M. (2019). Ahl Al-Hadith dan Ahl Al-Ra’y: Dari Konstruksi Metodologi Hingga Tipologi Pemahaman Hadis Dialektik. Mutawatir, 9(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2019.9.2.237-255
Nakata, K. (1989). Logic of ahl al-hadith. Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan, 32(2), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.5356/jorient.32.2_76
Rizani, R., Jalaluddin, J., Azhari, F., & Hamdi, F. (2024). Istinbath Hukum Islam Masa Kenabian dan Sahabat: Sejarah, Karakteristik, dan Metode Ijtihad dalam Membentuk Hukum Islam. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 2(2), 619–644. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v2i2.540
Saladin, B., Taufiq, M., & Syatirah, S. (2023). The Impact of Nashirudin Al Albani’s Tarjih Hadith Method on Differences in Mazhab and Qur’anic Interpretation. Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis, 8(1), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v8i1.28456
Sarmini, M. A. (2020). Resolving Conflict Between The Texts Using Tarjih And Jam’ Methodology Of Ahl Al-Ra’y And Ahl Al-Hadith: An Analytical And Critical Study: Anas Sarmini. Darulfunun Ilahiyat, 31(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2020.31.1.0008
Setiyanto, D. (2017). Pemikiran Hukum Islam Imam Malik Bin Anas (Pendekatan Sejarah Sosial). Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.22515/al-ahkam.v2i2.177
Setiyanto, D. (2018). Fatwa Sebagai Media Social Engineering (Analisis Fatwa MUI di Bidang Hukum Keluarga Pasca Reformasi). Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 3(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.22515/al-ahkam.v3i1.1342
Subhi, A., Umar, M., & Ramlah. (2023). Dinamika Hukum Islam: (Studi Pemikiran Ahl Al-Hadis dan Ahl Al-Ra’yi). Jurnal Indragiri Penelitian Multidisiplin, 3(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.58707/jipm.v3i1.411
Surur, A. (2024). Al-Sayyid Muhammad Alawi’s Thoughts on The Hadith of Glorifying the Ahl Al-Bayt. Millati: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities, 8(2), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.18326/millati.v8i2.546
Syarifuddin, A. (1997). Ushul Fiqih, Jilid I. Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu.
Taha, M., Hukum, R., Amir, A., Abdul Rahman, T., & Nabil, A. (2024). Mahmoud Mohamed Taha dan Rekonstruksi Hukum Islam. Pledoi (Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan), 3(2). https://doi.org/10.56721/pledoi.v3i2.389
Taherabadi, Y. (2024). A Reflection on Hadith Evidences Regarding the Validity of Official and Ordinary Documents in Islamic Law. Islamic Law Research Journal, 25(65). https://doi.org/10.30497/LAW.2024.245910.3506
Tahir, M., Kurniati, & Marilang. (2024). Problematika Pemberlakuan Hukum Islam di Negara Nomokrasi Indonesia. Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 5(2), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.55623/au.v5i2.342
Yahya, A., & Zainuddin, M. (2021). The Interpretation of the Hadith on the Characteristics of Women and Its Implications for Islamic Law. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 5(1), 276. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.9593
Yılmaz, M. (2024). Eman Hadisi: Hadis Tekniği ve Ehl-i Rey Bağlamında Hanefî Fıkhı Açısından Bir Analiz. İdrak Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.62297/idrak.1369359
Yusuf, N. (2016). Ahl Al-Hadis Dan Ahl Ra’y (Dinamika Hukum Islam Dari Masa Peralihan Sahabat ke Masa Para Imam Madzhab). Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.30984/as.v5i2.231
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Saiful Anwar, Deden Abdul Malik, Ransya Ayu Zulvia, Silvanus Fauziansah, Bambang Fitrianto, Syahrul Anwar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The IJLS content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain unrestricted copyright and publishing rights of their articles. Authors grant the Founded by the LETIGES, and published by the NAJAHA Education Development Center (NEDC) in collaboration with APJHI a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use or reuse the article freely if its original authors and citation details are identified.
Self-Archiving
IJLS allows and encourages authors to self-archive their articles on institutional or other specialized repositories, their personal websites and social-networking sites such as ResearchGate and Academia.edu. Authors are advised to use the final PDF version published on the Journal’s website for self-archiving purposes. However, it’s not an obligation and authors are free to use the version they prefere; pre-print, post-print or publisher’s PDF version.
There is no embargo on the self-archiving of articles. Authors are allowed deposition of articles on repositories, personal websites and social-networking sites immediately after publication on the journal website. Accepted manuscripts can be also self-archived by authors.
